
Binance US non riesce a garantire partnership bancarie: WSJ
- Il ramo statunitense dell'exchange di criptovalute guidato da Changpeng Zhao, Binance US, non è stato in grado di garantire accordi di partnership bancaria con le banche del paese.
- I recenti fallimenti della Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) e della Signature Bank hanno lasciato la principale borsa statunitense senza un partner.
- The crypto exchange is holding clients funds via financial technology firm Prime Trust, which is storing clients’ funds via its banking partners.
- The exchange recently stated that it was “transitioning to new banking and payment service providers over the next several weeks.”
Binance, the world’s biggest crypto exchange by spot trading volume, has become a concern for many regulators following the demise of Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX in 2022. The US arm of the Changpeng Zhao-led crypto exchange has been unable to secure banking partnership deals, and it seems that the crypto exchange is losing credibility in the region due to regulatory troubles. The crypto exchange is unable to find a partner to serve as a fiat on-ramp and off-ramp for its clients in the United States.
Come per l'a rapporto dal Wall Street Journal dell'8 aprile, i recenti fallimenti della Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) e della Signature Bank hanno lasciato Binance US senza un partner. È fondamentale notare che le due banche erano note per supportare le società crittografiche e avevano fondi depositati da varie istituzioni focalizzate sulle criptovalute.
Citing people familiar with the matter, Binance US is currently dependent on the middleman’s banks to store funds on its behalf. One of the factors contributing to this situation is the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) and state regulators’ behavior towards banks with crypto clients.
Barney Frank, a member of the Signature Bank board and a former Congressman known for co-authoring the Dodd-Frank Act following the 2008 market collapse to prevent a global crisis, recently told an interviewer that the bank had a “solid loan book,” and if the regulators had allowed the financial institution to open, they “could’ve continued.’ Frank believes that the regulators closed the bank to prove that “crypto is toxic.”
“They closed us even though there was no good, compelling reason to do that because they wanted to show that banks shouldn’t be involved in crypto,” said Frank.
Un altro evento importante da menzionare qui è che la Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) degli Stati Uniti sued Binance Holdings and its CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao per presunte violazioni commerciali. Il regolatore ha affermato che Binance operava illegalmente negli Stati Uniti e sta indagando se Binance ha aiutato gli utenti statunitensi ad accedere a titoli non registrati.
It is a fact that the US arm of the Binance crypto exchange needs a banking partner to hold clients’ funds directly so that these funds can be used for transactions. However, banks are hesitant to do so. The crypto exchange has been the focus of a CFTC investigation since 2021. The crypto firm’s attempts to make partnership deals with banks such as Cross River Bank and Customers Bancorp, have failed.
Il ramo statunitense di Binance ha affermato che i suoi servizi sono stati influenzati dalla mancanza di una partnership bancaria diretta e, di conseguenza, ha disse that it “was transitioning to new banking and payment service providers over the next several weeks.” The exchange stated that some USD deposit services would be temporarily impacted during the transition.
“We work with multiple US-based banking and payment providers and continue to onboard new partners while upgrading our internal systems to create a more stable fiat platform and offer additional services,” a spokesman for Binance.US told the WSJ.
It is also crucial to note that, as of now, Binance US is holding client funds via financial technology firm Prime Trust. A spokesperson from Prime Trust revealed that all the funds are stored through the firm’s banking partners.